04-08-2010, 23:48
GFO escribió:@Eddie: nVidia tiene lo mejor en graficos para laburar man, ninguna (NINGUNA) ATI puede hacer lo que puede una Quadro FX de alta categoria en cuanto a laburar graficos. En juegos no sera lo mejor, pero para laburar graficos de forma zarpada y hacer laburar la placa al 150%, nVidia le pasa el trapo con las Quadro.
FireGL 8800 vs Quadro 4
Extraído de http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/d...html#sect8
Cita:Conclusion
As the tests showed, we can't say which solution, ATI FireGL 8800 or NVIDIA Quadro4, is better and which is worse. The graphics cards perform differently in different scenes and it makes them fit into different segments of the professional graphics market.
In the scenes with complex geometry in Wireframe mode, ATI graphics card is an indisputable leader. Also FireGL 8800 proved much faster when working with several viewports rather than with a single viewport opened to the maximum, and in this case FireGL 8800 is faster in both modes: Wireframe and Smooth + Highlights. These features make ATI FireGL 8800 a perfect choice for model-makers, for instance.
The advantage of Quadro4 900XGL shows its best in Smooth + Highlights mode in case of a single viewport. NVIDIA solutions are beyond any competition especially when working with the miniatures of large textures, which makes it the best buy for animation needs and texturing of the ready surfaces.
No estoy metiendo pua eh, nada mas quiero remarcar que hay un margen entre el "ninguna" y que en realidad dependiendo de las condiciones a veces las ati anden mejor o a veces las nvidia anden mejor.
